RFK Jr. vaccine advisers change advice on the coastal levels, MMRV vaccines for young children

Friday, a panel of CDC experts changed some of their advice on COVVI-19 vaccines, one day after changing their recommendations around the measles vaccine, mumps, rubella and chickenpox (MMRV) for children.

Friday vote takes a step back by recommending the COVVI-19 shot. Rather than recommending it squarely for most adults As the panel has done in the pastHe voted that he should be accessible to everyone, and people should make a personal decision on the advisability of obtaining their doctor or not.

He also recommended to advise patients on more potential risks associated with COVVI-19 shots and just avoided states to require a prescription for shooting.

The advisory committee for vaccination practices also envisaged a change concerning the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns, but this decision was interrupted indefinitely during the meeting, which sometimes turned chaos and the argument between members.

The panel was hand -selected by the Secretary of Health and Social Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who ousted All 17 previous members of the Advisory Committee.

He appointed Eight new experts to the panel a few days later, then added Five others this week – many of which were skeptical with regard to vaccine safety and accused of disinformation spread.

US COVVI-19 Vaccines for COVVI-19 Vaccines offer the strongest protection against infection and severe death, even if people are still infected. A number of doctors concerned and public members have weighed with concerns about the evidence that the panel heard, who have questioned the safety of vaccines.

Look | RFK Jr. against American Senate: the view of the 3 -hour vaccine:

RFK Jr. vs American Senate: the 3 -hour vaccination force test

In an intense three -hour test, the American senators have toasted the health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the vaccine policy and his dismissal from the Centers for Disease Control. Andrew Chang breaks down the key moments of stormy exchanges between Kennedy and Democrats and Republicans, and why he faces a meticulous examination now in particular.

After Friday’s meeting, the president of the American Pediatric Association (AAP) warned that the comments and questions of the panelists showed a lack of knowledge on the vaccines.

“What we see is what happens when individuals who do not have a basic understanding of how vaccines are delivered make these crucial political decisions for the American public. They do not know what they are doing,” said Sean T. O’Leary of the AAP.

He also said that many questions remained on who will have access to these vaccines, because “what we get this (panel) is confusion”.

The group’s work is to advise the CDC on American vaccination hours. As the best health organization in the country, doctors turn to the CDC on how to advise their own patients, and many insurers make decisions on the vaccines for whom they will pay according to the CDC recommendations.

Change of MMRV, postpone the vote on hepatitis B

The Committee voted Thursday to recommend against parents to choose a MMRV combined vaccine for children under the age of four. Instead, they recommend the use of a combined shot from measles-rubine and a separate blow for chickenpox (also known as chickenpox).

The shooting of the combined MMRV was previously an option for children of 12 months or more, although the CDC already recommends that the MMR and separate chickenpox vaccines are given under 4 years, unless parents express a preference for combined fire.

Look | This is how measles attacks:

Layer: Understand the most contagious preventable disease | On this subject

There are early signals that measles – one of the most contagious but avoidable diseases in the world – can spread in parts of Canada. Andrew Chang breaks down the way the virus attacks the body and what makes it so contagious.

The panel made their decision according to the risk of febrile crises (a convulsion caused by a fever), which sometimes occur in children after receiving the first dose of the combined vaccine, although it is rare.

According to CDC’s own data, these crises only occur in eight children by 10,000 who get the combined mmrv. There is also a very low risk of febrile crises with mmr vaccines and chickenpox – about 4 out of 10,000.

These crises can also occur when children have a fever due to a disease – including infection by diseases such as chickenpox or measles – and also generally do not cause long -term damage.

Following the vote, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said that the CDC meeting had promoted “erroneous information” on infant vaccines, adding that their organization still considers both vaccines.

While the CDC always recommends that people are vaccinated against the four infectious diseases, the virologist of the University of Saskatchewan Angela Rasmussen has said that the decision will force parents to reserve additional vaccinations and make their children sit. This additional layer of difficulty could mean that some children are simply not vaccinated against the whole list of diseases, she said.

She says that the absorption of vaccines in the United States has already decreased, and that an additional layer of difficulty will mean that more children will become non-vaccinated and will eventually become sick.

“The addition of another mechanism … to reduce the absorption of vaccines will have enormous consequences in terms of measles epidemics that have occurred recently, and in fact are underway,” said Rasmussen.

The panel had to vote on the delay at the first blow of hepatitis B until the age of at least a month in infants born of mothers who test negative for the virus. This vote was postponed until Friday morning, then repelled indefinitely.

However, the group voted in favor of testing all pregnant women for hepatitis B.

Before the voting of hepatitis B, medical experts and patient defenders feared to delay the fact of giving the vulnerable shot to infections, which can cause liver insufficiency and liver cancer later in life.

What does this mean for Canadians?

None of the CDC votes directly affects Canadians or the recommended use of one or other of these vaccines north of the border.

In Canada, The National Consultative Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends Either the MMRV combined vaccine, or the mmr blow and the separate chickenpox vaccination at the age of 12 to 15 months, and a second dose at 18 months or some time before the start of the school.

But Canada also buys many vaccines from the United States, according to Dr. Donald Vinh, a specialist in infectious diseases at the McGill University Health Center. If the changes in CDC recommendations lead to less request for MMRV shooting, this could mean less production of American manufacturers – which could affect the Canadian supply.

“We are not only talking about medical decision, but also logistics,” said Vinh.

In addition, viruses and disinformation of vaccines cannot be contained by borders, says Rasmussen. She emphasizes that because of skepticism on mmr and MMRV vaccines, vaccination rates against these diseases fell Canada already.

“If people are starting to import these avoidable diseases (traveling) and vaccination rates become low enough in Canada, we will also start to see the epidemics of these pathogens,” said Rasmussen. “Where the United States goes, many other countries follow.”

Canada and other nations around the world will be affected by the loss of good health expertise, because the CDC has historically played a leading role in the research and vaccine policy. Lynora Saxinger, infectious doctor of diseases, says that she is used to connecting to these APIP meetings to hear their evidence because the CDC was a guiding health organization.

But now, “most of the people I know in my field … would no longer consider decisions from the CDC as robust decisions,” said Saxinger.

Because the CDC has been a source of good information in the past, Saxinger says that the risk is twofold: people who do not know the changes to the leadership of the CDC could end up being ill-informed by the future information they have published, she says, while the skeptics of the vaccines could indicate these decisions as proof.

Vaccinal skeptics on the panel

Under the direction of Kennedy, the Committee has undergone a dramatic transformation in recent months.

In early June, Kennedy ousted All 17 members of the Advisory Committee. He appointed Eight new experts to the panel a few days later, then added Five others this week. Although some of them have already served in CDC or FDA committees, many were previously skeptical about the spread of infectious diseases, vaccines or both.

One of the named people, Retsef Levi, previously threw a doubt about the safety of mRNA vaccines, saying that they can cause serious damage and death, especially in children, According to Reuters.

Martin Kulldorff, another of RFK’s choices and chairman of the committee, was also an architect of the Great Barrington Declaration – a document published in October 2020 who pleaded against the COVVI -19 locking. He co -founded a newspaper that has high speculation among scientists and health experts who worries, it could tackle questionable information, and was also taken from Harvard University In 2024, when he refused to be vaccinated.

On Thursday, Kulldorff defended the credibility of those in the panel and called was the most “pro-Vaccin scientist in the country”. He also declared that his opponents should be willing to test their science in a debate – which he said that he would be willing to have publicly with the former CDC directors.

“The members of this … Committee are determined to reassure the public and restore public confidence (in vaccines) by removing unnecessary risks and damages whenever possible. It is a pro-Vaccin program,” he said.

“The false accusations according to which we … are non-scientific and dangerous anti-vaxrs, which simply adds legitimacy to anti-vacuum positions, damaging both public health and confidence in vaccines.”