Charlie Kirk Assassination: The director of the FBI got angry at the fact that not to keep him informed

False insurance was more than a shift. He highlighted the uncertainty with high issues surrounding the management’s direction of the office when his credibility – and his – undergoes extraordinary pressure.

Patel now addresses the Congress surveillance hearings the coming week to which the future week faces not only questions about this survey, but also wider doubts as to whether it can stabilize a federal agency for the application of the law fragmented by political fighting and internal upheavals.

Democrats are on the verge of a layer on a purge of senior executives who caused a trial, his pursuit of the grievances of President Donald Trump long after the end of the investigation in Russia, and a realignment of the resources which prioritize the fight against illegal immigration and the street crime, even if the agency was defined for decades by its work on illegal threats counter-intellect and public corruption.

This is added to the questions about the management of files in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual traffic case, the addition of a co-deputor director to serve alongside Dan Bongino, and the use of polygraphs on certain agents in recent months to identify the sources of leakage. The Republicans, on the other hand, are likely to join his defense or redirect the spotlight to the criticisms of the office.

The hearings will offer the Patel its most consecutive scene to date, and perhaps the most clear test of knowing if it can convince the country that the FBI, under its watch, can avoid completing its errors in times of political violence and deepening of distrust.

“Due to the skepticism that certain members of the Senate have had and still have, it is extremely important that it allows very well during these surveillance hearings” Tuesday and Wednesday, said Gregory Brower, a former FBI executive who was his senior Congress Affairs.

The FBI refused to comment on the future testimony of the Patel to the Committee.

He said the subject was “in detention”

Kirk’s murder was always going to be a closely examined investigation, not only because it was the last shine of political violence in the United States, but also because of Kirk’s friendships with Trump, a patel and other personalities and allies of the administration.

While the agents of Salt Lake City investigated, the patel’s account on the social media platform X displayed that “the subject of the horrible shooting today who took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in detention.” Utah governor Spencer Cox said at a quasi-component press conference that “the one who did this, we will find you”, suggesting that the authorities were still looking for. Patel shortly after displayed that the person in detention had been released.

“This does not transmit the message you want the public to hear,” said Chris O’Leary, a retired FBI terrorism director. “It had the opposite effect. People are starting to wonder what’s going on. It looks like Keystone cops and it continues to worsen. ”

The next day, a planned afternoon press conference was canceled for “fast developments” while Patel and Bongino flew to UTAH. It took place in place in the evening. Patel appeared but did not speak.

While the research extended for more than a day, a patel passed angry with the FBI staff on Thursday on what he perceived as a failure to keep him informed, including that he did not quickly show a photograph of the alleged shooter. It is according to two people familiar with the question that were not allowed to discuss it by name and spoke under the cover of anonymity to the Associated Press. The New York Times reported the call details earlier.

Asked about the examination of his performance, the FBI published a statement saying that she had worked with the local police to bring the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, in justice and “will continue to be transparent with the American people”.

The overall patel response did not go unnoticed in the conservative circles. An eminent strategist, Christopher Rofo, posted on X that it was “time for the Republicans to assess if Kash Patel is the right man to manage the FBI”.

Patel, at a press conference on Friday and again on social networks on Saturday, praised its surveillance of the investigation, stressing its decision to make Robinson photographs known as a break in the investigation. Robinson’s father recognized him from photos, triggering a chain of events that made the son went.

Patel received his support from Trump on Saturday. He republished a Fox News Channel journalist who said she spoke with Trump and that the president said that Patel and the FBI “had done an excellent job.”

Then there is the purge of the staff

On the same day, Kirk was killed, Patel faced a separate problem: a trial of three senior executives from the FBI fired in an August purge who suffered decades of institutional experience and which they characterized as a campaign of remuneration for the Trump administration.

Among them, Brian Driscoll, as an acting director of the FBI, at the start of the Trump administration, resisted the requests of the Ministry of Justice for the names of the agents who investigated the riot of January 6, 2021 in the Capitol. Driscoll allegedly alleged the trial he had been released following a confrontation with the administration’s requests to dismiss an FBI pilot who had been wrongly identified on social networks such as the case agent in the survey on classified documents on Trump.

The trial quotes a patel as having told Driscoll that his work depended on the dismissal of the people whom the White House wanted to disappear. The FBI refused to comment on the trial.

The other complainants are Spencer Evans, a former high -level agent of Las Vegas, whose letter of dismissal cited a “reasonable and too zealous lack of character” in the implementation of COVID -19 policies while serving as a human resources manager – an assertion that his lawyers call False – and Steve Jensen, who helped to cover the FB surveys in January 6. Capitol Riot.

The upheaval continues a trend that started even before Patel takes over, while more than half a dozen of the highest leaders of the office were forced to get out under a justification by the Ministry of Justice that they could not make them “trust” to implement the Trump’s agenda.

Since then, there has been a significant turnover in the 55 FBI field offices. Some left due to planned promotions and retirement, but others because of the ultimatums to accept new assignments or resign. Salt Lake City office manager, an investigator to combat experienced terrorism, was pushed out of his post a few weeks before Kirk was killed in a UTAH college, said people familiar with the move.

In July, an agent based in Norfolk, Virginia, Michael Feinberg, is the author of a story in the first person saying that he had been informed to put himself for a demotion and a polygraphic examination because of his friendship with Peter Strzok, an FBI’s main agent in the investigation into the links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign on the FBI. Feinberg resigned instead.

FBI priorities move under a patel

Patel arrived at the FBI after having been a criticism of his management, especially for Trump surveys which, according to him, politicizes the institution. Under the Patel and the Attorney General Pam Bondi, the FBI and the Ministry of Justice were tangled in their own politically rich surveys, such as one to the Prosecutor General of New York, Letitia James.

He quickly moved to redo the office, the FBI and the Ministry of Justice working to investigate one of the main grievances of the Republican President – Trump -Russia’s investigation, aged years. Trump regularly called this investigation, which has not established a criminal plot between Russia and Trump’s campaign, a “hoax” and a “witch hunt”.

The Ministry of Justice seemed to be confirmed in an unusual statement according to which she was investigating the former FBI director, James Comey, and the former CIA director John Brennan, pivotal players from the Russian saga listed by a patel in a book he wrote as members of the Executive Deep State branch, but did not say that. Grand jury, and the agents and prosecutors began to request information and interviews from former officials linked to the survey, according to several people familiar with awareness.

The detractors of the new Russia’s investigation consider that it is a transparent attempt to transform the page of the fierce reaction that the FBI and the Ministry of Justice have endured elements of the Trump base after their July announcement that they would not publish any additional document of Epstein’s investigation.

Patel has raised the fight against street crime, drug trafficking and illegal immigration to the FBI agenda, in accordance with Trump’s agenda.

The FBI was the key to taking control by the federal government of the Washington police department, participating in partner agencies in crimes for crimes, such as driving in a state of drunkenness, and not historically considered as central priorities of the FBI.

The office does not apologize for aggressive police in American cities that Trump administration maintains that it has been consumed by crime. Patel and Bongino promoted the number of arrests involving federal police in an initiative that they nicknamed the Summer Heat operation. Patel says that the thousands of cumulative arrests, many of which are linked to immigration, are “what happens when you let the good cops be good cops”.

But some fear that the objective of street crime can draw the attention of sophisticated public corruption and national security threats for which the office is mainly, if not responsible, responsible for the investigation. In an example, a federal corruption team in Washington was dissolved last spring.

“One of the big problems I see is that the investigation programs that have been most injured this year are those that the FBI really does, or the FBI does better than anyone,” said Matt Desarno, who retired in 2022 at the head of the Dallas field office.