Grok’s “ spicy ” mode makes the buttocks of women’s celebrity of women (but not men)

0
elon_look-1200x675.png


This week, Elon Musk officially launched Grok Imagine, the image and the video generator of Xai for iOS, for people who subscribe to Supergrok and Premium + X. The application allows users to create NSFW content with its “spicy” mode, and the rod reported on Tuesday. But it is not only Swift that should be concerned with the new softcore porn tool generated by Musk.

Gizmodo has created about two dozen videos of politicians, celebrities and technological personalities using the Grok Spicy mode, although some have been blurred or returned with a message reading “moderate video”. When Grok made scandalous images, that would only make those who represent the women really not secure. Men ‘videos were the kind of thing that wouldn’t really increase a lot of eyebrows.

X has been overwhelmed in the past two days with images generated by the AI of naked women and advice on how to reach the most nudity. But users, who have created tens of millions of grok imagine images according to Musk, do not even need to go to a great effort to obtain deep buttocks of naked celebrities. Gizmodo did not explicitly ask for nudity in the examples we cite in this article, but we still have a lot. All we have done is to click on the spicy button, which is one of the four options, as well as personalized, fun and normal.

Gizmodo tested Grok imagine by generating not only videos of Taylor Swift, but other eminent women like Melania Trump and historical characters like Martha Washington. Melania Trump was a vocal supporter of the care law, which makes the publication of non -consensual “intimate imagery” illegal, including Deepfakes.

Grok has also created an unsecured video of the feminist writer of the late Valerie Solanas, author of 1967 Manifest. Almost all the videos represented the women we tested as losing clothes to make them naked the size, although Solanas’ video was unique in that it was completely naked.

What’s going on when you try to generate spicy men’s videos? The AI will ask the male silhouette that removes its shirt, but there is nothing more scandalous than that. When Gizmodo understood that he would only remove a man’s shirt, we encouraged the AI to create a shirtless image of Elon Musk and to see what she could do with that. The result was the extremely ridiculous (and safe for work) video you see below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unisjoelnbi

Attempts to make videos of Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Joaquin Phoenix and Charlie Chaplin, as well as presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George Washington, met the same limitation. The videos generated by Ai-Ai, the men will remove their shirts most of the time, but there is nothing beyond. And if there is something more, it is generally so to cringe teeth that we care about users who die from used embarrassment. Make a spicy video of Errol Musk, Elon’s father, produced the same thing. He just removed his shirt.

When we made a generic man to see if the spicy mode would be more loose with his sexual content because it was not a known public figure, she always made a bizarre and clumsy video of a man pulling on his pants. It should be noted that the pants seem to be a combination of shorts for a leg and a long jeans for the other before turning into a few shorts. The audio for each video was also generated automatically without any other instruction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK6GY7H2OX4

Trying the same thing with a generic woman made much more revealing images of a woman in a swimsuit that shoots the top to reveal her naked breasts.

Most traditional AI videos generators, such as Sora d’Openai and Veo de Google, have railing to protect against the creation of things like revenge porn and celebrity images. And it seems that Xai does it in some ways, at least for men. But most people would probably oppose their image to be used to create an AI AI in various undressing states. Gizmodo contacted Musk via XAI to ask questions about guarantees and if it is acceptable for users to create naked celebrity breast videos. We haven’t heard.

One of the most striking things about the Grok AI IAGE generator is that it is often terrible to make convincing celebrities. For example, the images below were generated during the request of vice-president JD Vance and actress Sydney Sweeney. And unless we have completely forgotten what these two people look like, it is not even close. This could prove to be the saving grace of Musk, given that a tool like this is required to attract proceedings.

Sydney Sweeney JD Vance
Screenshots of the images created by Supergrok which are supposed to represent Sydney Sweeney and JD Vance. Screenshots: xai

There were other seeds, such as when we created an image generated by the AI of President Harry Truman who looked very much like him, and the man’s nipples seemed to be outside his clothing shirt. Truman, in spicy mode, removed his shirt to reveal his bare chest, which had identical nipples.

When Gizmodo created images using the prompt “Gizmodo Writer Matt Novak”, the result was similar to what we saw with videos for Elon Musk and Generic Men. The figure (which, we must note, is much better than the real Matt Novak) removed his shirt in a single click on the spicy button.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86iwobwhddi

As the penis note, there is an age check window when a user first tries to create a video with Grok Imagine, but there does not seem to be control by the company to confirm the year when a given user was really born. Fortunately, the Gizmodo generation of a Mickey Mouse cartoon in spicy mode has made nothing scandalous, just the animated character jumping without danger. An image of the Batman AI gave an “spicy” result which does not look like other male figures, where it only disabled its summit.

Gizmodo did not try to create children’s images, although the penis has tried this in spicy mode and reports that nothing inappropriate has been rendered. The “spicy” mode was always an option that was listed. “You can always select it, but in all my tests, it simply added a generic movement,” notes the penis. Elon Musk very sadly restored a report on X which displayed sexual children’s abuse in 2023, according to the Washington Post.

It may not be surprising that the new NSFW video creator from Elon Musk has different standards for men and women. The billionaire recently retweeted a figure in the far right which said that women were “anti-white” because they are “weak”. Tesla’s CEO, who suggested in 2024 that he wanted to permeate Taylor Swift, is not exactly known to be a women’s rights champion.

Gizmodo signed up for the supergrok subscription of $ 30 per month and could only test it for about 1.5 hours before we are told that we had reached our image creation limit. Curiously, users can always create a single motionless image for a prompt after getting the warning and generating NSFW videos using this solitary image, but it is much more limited than what was previously available.

We were told to go to Supergrok Heavy for $ 300 per month if we wanted to continue using the tool with all its features. But since we do not need more shitty images of naked celebrities to write this article, we refused. We had the answers we were looking for, unfortunately.


https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/08/elon_look-1200×675.png

About The Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *