Taylor Swift, defender of the artists, would use AI in videos

Taylor Swift said one day: “You deserve to have the art you make.” Apparently, this does not apply to the millions of artists who have had their works integrated into the wooden shredder which is generative tools of AI. From the perspective of the release of the latest album in the world’s largest album, “Life of a Showgirl”, fans were treated to Easter egg videos designed to build media threw. Instead, strong -eyed swings began to spot what seemed to be an imagery generated by AI in Teaser videos and launched quick vestiges in the situation.

The alleged generative EA material appeared in a series of short promotional videos. These videos were accessible via QR codes which were displayed on 12 orange doors located in 12 different cities. The videos, originally downloaded via YouTube shorts, are no longer available, but Gizmodo has examined the rest allegedly found online. Each video included letters which, once assembled, provided the sentence: “You have to remember everything, but above all this, the crowd is your king.” But the mystery that the king of Taylor took more interest seemed to be: “Why did some of these videos seem a little?”

No one in the Swift camp has in any way confirmed the use of generative AI in promotional videos, but there is certainly enough on the screen to create suspicions. Users have highlighted the crushing and disappearance of images in certain videos suggesting that what you see is created with a generative AI. The videos seem to be part of a partnership with Google, according to a Tennessean report, which covered the revelation of the Orange door which appeared in Nashville. Gizmodo contacted Google to comment on its involvement in the videos, but did not receive an answer at the time of publication.

It’s ai, look at the hanger disappear at random

Taylor Swift, a billionaire, uses AI for promotion. pic.twitter.com/f4rp7fwbct

– oxygen (@happuifutime) October 4, 2025

Others called a lettering that appears in different plans which have a quality generated by AI, in that they are largely absurd. A treadmill that appears in a video, for example, has pimples that read “MOP”, “Suop” and “NCLINE”, with letters that are curved and blurred in a way that suggests that there is something more than simple wear on the buttons. Another image, a notebook, also seems to contain an invented lettering that a human would be unlikely to do, because of the fact that a human knows what letters are.

It is Ai + either Taylor is the powerful woman who has power on all aspects of her art (music, promo, etc.), so she has definitely approved this or she does not let it change only when it benefits Taylors OK? pic.twitter.com/mckplsduxw

– FIFO | The life of a showgirl 🍂🍁 (@Closeblvd) October 5, 2025

Not a criticism of Taylor herself, moreover her team / business…. Lettering on this treadmill is a highly known indicator of the text generated by AI. pic.twitter.com/qcdzockufw

– Katie ❤️b (@ 13PetsDept) October 4, 2025

The generative AI systems are notoriously bad for generating text because, although these systems have been trained on massive sets of data and images containing text, the model has no concept of what it “looks at”. This is why generative AI models can spit out images of watches and clocks, but it is often difficult to bring them to display specific times, because the model has no idea how to say the time. He just knows that clocks have lines that mark time, not what these lines really indicate.

The inconsistencies were surprisingly common throughout the videos. Viewers have underlined an squirrel that seems to be transformed into chipmunk at some point, and a changing number of lamps that appear in another blow. The pure and hard of Swift has particularly attacked a version generated by Ai-Ai of a piano and the guitar which was used during the ERA tour of Swift, which should not be surprising given the great understanding of these custom instruments at the time.

It does not seem that generative AI was used in the creation of Swift clips for the new album, and there does not seem to be an indication that the generative was used in the feature film published to mark the launch of the disc. Gizmodo contacted the representatives of Taylor Swift, as well as Rodrigo Prieto, director of photography of “Taylor Swift: the official release of a showgirl”, to comment on the potential use of generative AI in making these promotional videos, musical videos and film. No party responded to the file at the time of publication.

Face, it seems to be a fairly major error. You cannot say to your Superfans, who think that each word you talk about and the image you publish contains secret messages, to search for clues in a video generated by AI and do not expect them to reject the inconsistencies. But hey, maybe these strange anomalies only make another revelation of Easter eggs, right?