The study of the regime exchange reveals how ultra-transformed food can derail weight loss

In the event that you needed more incitement to reduce ultra-transformed food, a new diet exchange study reveals today that people have undergone greater weight loss while eating less processed food than they have done when they have eaten a diet and ultra treated nutritionally.

In a six -month trial led by scientists from the University College of London, the study participants were assigned to one of the two diet regimes to follow for eight weeks, then took a four -week break before spending the other diet for an additional eight weeks. Participants lost more weight while eating the mini-transformed diet than that ultra-transformed; They also lose more unhealthy fat. The results, published Monday in Nature Medicine, suggest that, among other things, ultra-transformed regimes are particularly good for attaching the food desires of people, the researchers said.

Although there is a debate on what constitutes an ultra-transformed food, there are generally products or ingredients that have undergone high levels of industrialized transformation, such as breakfast sausages, candies or sodas. There is an increasing mountain of evidence that suggests that a diet rich in ultra-transformed food is less healthy as a whole diet mainly composed of whole foods, and that ultra-grey food can increase the risk of certain diseases. Most of this research, however, shows only a correlation between ultra-transformed regimes and less important health results, not a cause and direct link. Clinical trials can provide more solid evidence, but they are notoriously difficult to do in the world of nutrition science for many reasons, in particular funding, the researchers said.

“Clinical trials are expensive and there has been a generally less funding amount of funding for food and nutrition research given its importance for health,” said Gizmodo, author Sam Dicken, researcher of the Department of Behavioral Sciences and UCL health. “We were fortunate to have joint funding from a medical charity and a British non -governmental organization to finance the test.”

The study involved 55 adult volunteers who ate either a diet at least transformed, or an ultra-suitable diet consisting of prepackaged meals for eight weeks, then took a four-week break before going to diet that they had not yet eaten for eight weeks. Above all, the two diets were manufactured to follow the Food Recommendations of the United Kingdom, so the ultra-grey regime was not designed to be very different in the nutritional quality of the mini-transformed diet. For example, the ultra-suitable diet included breakfast cereals as a meal, while the mini-transformed equivalent meal was a nocturnal.

Regardless of the diet followed, they lost weight, but the difference between the two patterns was significant. People eating a diet at least transformed lost on average 2% of their reference weight, while those who have an ultra-talented diet lost on average 1% and consumed a little more calories overall. And people who have lost weight in the mini-transformed diet specifically lost more mass linked to fat and visceral fat than on the ultra-suitable diet. Visceral fat surrounds our abdominal organs and is associated with worst health results than other types of fat found elsewhere in the body.

The results highlight the importance of following the government’s food directives, said Dicken. But the study also indicates that people who want to lose weight can see the most to benefit from food for mini-transformed transformation. As for the reasons why ultra-transformed foods are worse for diets, researchers have their informed assumptions.

Ultra-treble foods tend to have more attractive textures and artificially stimulated flavors, which often means that they are softer or easier to eat and tasty. Their appearance and packaging could also make them more visually attractive to potential customers. Interestingly, the volunteers of this study indicated that the two regimes were just as satisfactory to eat on average, but they also declared having better control over their desires during the mini-transformed food diet. Dicken noted that the researchers were unable to test these potential explanations directly in this test, however, so more research is necessary to know with certainty.

The team has already launched its next study, which is testing a behavioral support program to reduce the contribution of people in ultra-adjustment food. But Dicken warned that he would take widespread societal changes, not individual rumbles, to change our collective regime for the best.

“Political actions that improve our oberogenic food environment and move away from individual responsibility are necessary to ensure that healthy diets are accessible and affordable for all,” he said.